International vs. National Trademark Filing Guide (X): Specification of Goods/Services Planning
Trademark protection is not all-encompassing; it must be attached to specific goods or services (Nice Classification). Precise "land-marking" is the key to determining the value and stability of a trademark.
-
The "Dependency" Constraint in International Applications This is a major limitation of the Madrid System: the scope of goods in an international application must not exceed the scope of the basic application (home country filing).
-
National Flexibility: Individual filings have no such constraint. You can flexibly apply for "Software" in the U.S. and "Consulting" in Germany, with each scope independent of the others.
|
-
"Localization" of Product Descriptions While most countries follow the Nice Classification, specific requirements for terminology vary significantly.
-
USA (USPTO): Requirements are extremely precise and detailed. Generic terms commonly used in international applications (e.g., "Computer Programs") will almost certainly trigger an Office Action in the U.S.
-
China (CNIPA): Uses a unique "Sub-class" system. If your international application includes items that don't match the Chinese standard terminology, examiners may misclassify them, creating gaps in your protection.
-
National Advantage: Local attorneys draft items based on the "Pre-approved Lists" of their respective offices, minimizing refusal risks and maximizing protection scope.
|
-
Balancing "Standard" vs. "Non-Standard" Items
Summary Advice
If your products are standardized and straightforward (e.g., clothing), the Madrid System is sufficient. However, if your business is diverse and complex (e.g., a tech firm combining hardware, software, and data services), we recommend National Applications for core markets to ensure precise "land-marking" and avoid restricted rights due to improper descriptions.
English
Home
Knowledge
KNOWLEDGE
