International vs. National Trademark Filing Guide (VII): Management and Flexibility
The real test of corporate administrative efficiency begins after the trademark certificates are issued. This article compares the management efficiency of both routes during "Post-Registration Actions" such as changes of address, assignments, or renewals.
-
Changing Information: One-Click Sync vs. Multi-Country Hassle Companies inevitably undergo "Name Changes" or "Relocations" during their growth.
-
Trademark Assignment: Centralized Management as a Double-Edged Sword
-
International Application: Assignments can also be handled centrally through WIPO. However, there is a catch: the Assignee (buyer) must also meet the "Nexus" eligibility of a Madrid System member state; otherwise, the transfer cannot be completed.
-
National Applications: Assignments are much more flexible. Regardless of the buyer’s nationality, the transfer is valid as long as it complies with local laws. This route is more versatile for companies planning to sell specific brand rights to localized entities.
|
-
Renewal: The Key to Saving Time and Effort Trademarks must be renewed every 10 years.
Summary Advice If you seek "Minimalist Management" and the brand will be held long-term by the parent company, the Madrid System is irreplaceable for its maintenance advantages. However, if you frequently engage in brand M&A or need to assign rights to different local entities in various countries, the operational flexibility of National Applications will better serve your needs.
Home
Knowledge
KNOWLEDGE
