Laman Utama
Pengetahuan
Singapura
Pelaburan di Singapura
Singapore Phantom Workers and the Consequences for Employees and Company Directors
|
(1) |
Criminal Liability
A person may face criminal charges if they allow a company to use their personal information to make false CPF contributions. This may apply even if they did not fully understand the arrangement. The penalty can be a fine of up to S$20,000, imprisonment of up to two years, or both.
|
|
(2) |
Risks relating to personal data and misuse of information
In many cases, individuals listed as “phantom workers” may be completely unaware of the arrangement. Unscrupulous employers may obtain an individual’s NRIC details through data leaks or other means and use the information to make CPF contributions without the individual’s knowledge or consent. If the arrangement is subsequently investigated, the individual may still be required to spend considerable time and effort explaining the circumstances to the relevant authorities.
|
|
(1) |
Main Offence Under the EFMA
The main offence is providing false information in work pass applications. Under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act (EFMA), a person convicted of this offence may face a fine of up to S$20,000, imprisonment of up to two years, or both.
|
|
(2) |
Multiple Legal Risks
In addition to the EFMA, such conduct may potentially give rise to offences under other laws. For example, claiming fictitious CPF expenses as tax-deductible expenses may constitute an offence under the Income Tax Act. Similarly, falsely declaring the number of employees in order to obtain government training grants or tax incentives may amount to the misuse of public funds and potentially constitute an offence under the Penal Code.
|
|
(3) |
Severe Restrictions on Employing Foreign Workers
Beyond criminal penalties, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) may suspend or permanently revoke a non-compliant company's ability to apply for work passes and may restrict the relevant directors from employing foreign workers in the future. For businesses that rely heavily on foreign labour, such restrictions could have a significant impact on their operations.
|
|
(1) |
No “grey area” under the law
Even if a purported ghost employee claims to be unaware of the arrangement, the court may still consider whether the individual should have taken reasonable steps to clarify the source or purpose of unexplained CPF contributions. A lack of knowledge may not necessarily provide a defence.
|
|
(2) |
Quota requirements are strictly enforced
Any attempt to circumvent foreign worker quota requirements through false or misleading arrangements may be treated as an attempt to undermine Singapore’s foreign manpower control framework. Such arrangements may therefore attract strict regulatory scrutiny and enforcement action.
|
|
(1) |
For Employers:
|
|
(2) |
For Employees:
|
|
Penafian
Segala maklumat dalam artikel ini adalah untuk tujuan perkongsian maklumat sahaja dan bukan merupakan nasihat profesional. Kaizen tidak akan bertanggungjawab terhadap sebarang kerugian atau kerosakan yang timbul daripada penggunaan maklumat tersebut.
|